DPP v. Jordan – Interpretation of Statutes

Spread the love

You can grab notes for other topics from here.

It was held that the publication of ‘obscene’ material, which was legal if it was done “in the interests of science, literature, art or learning, or of other objects of general concern”, that the defence that the material provided sexual deviants with an outlet for their frustrations was not ejusdem generis with science, literature, art or learning.

You can grab notes for other topics from here.

 


Spread the love

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *