You can grab notes for other topics from here.
- The issue arose whether the workmen employed in a canteen, which was run in the premises of Coates of India Ltd., could be regarded as the workmen of the respondent-company. It was urged that it was the statutory obligation on the part of the company to provide a canteen in the premises and, therefore, the employees of the canteen must be presumed to be the workmen employed by the respondent-company and no one else. The SC agreed with the view expressed by the High Court which had opined that the canteen employees were neither directly appointed by the company nor the company had any supervisory control over them and hence, they could not be treated as workmen employed by the respondent-company.
You can grab notes for other topics from here.
