Union of India v. T.R. Verma

The evidence of the respondent and his witnesses was not taken in the mode prescribed in the Evidence Act. The respondent did not cross-examine the witnesses because there was nothing left for him to cross-examine. Thus, there was no cross-examination, which is a fact, not that the request of the respondent to cross-examine was disallowed. The record in the light, find that there has been no violation of the principles of natural justice. The witnesses have been examined, and have spoken to all relevant facts bearing on the question.

You can find notes on other topics on Evidence here.  You can grab notes for other law subjects from here.