Pushpa v Milkhiram – Interpretation of Statutes

Spread the love

You can grab notes for other topics from here.

When a word has been defined in the interpretation clause, prima facie that definition governs wherever that word is used in the body of the Statute unless the context requires otherwise. The context is both internal and external. The internal context requires the interpreter to situate the disputed words within the section of which they are part and in relation to the rest of the Act.

The external context involves determining the meaning from ordinary linguistic usage (including any special technical meanings) from the purpose for which the provision was passed, and from the place of the provisions within the general scheme of statutory and common law rules and principles.

Even where the definition is exhaustive in as much as the word defined is said to mean a certain thing, it is possible for the word to have a somewhat different meaning in different sections of the Act depending upon the subject or context

You can grab notes for other topics from here.

 


Spread the love

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *